Security Testing Services

Test the attack surface before it becomes an incident.

ShabuShabu Security provides authorized penetration testing and vulnerability assessment services for web applications, APIs, SaaS platforms, authentication systems and AI-powered products.

Penetration testing Vulnerability assessment Manual security testing Attack-path validation
Security test coverage Modern Product Attack Surface
Authorized
WEB Application Layer Authentication, sessions, authorization, input handling and business logic.
API Interface Layer API permissions, object access, data exposure and request manipulation.
AI AI Layer Prompt injection, tool access, agent permissions and sensitive-data boundaries.
LOG Business Logic Workflow abuse, role boundaries and combinations of features that create attack paths.
Offensive security assessment

Security testing should answer more than “what vulnerabilities exist?”

A useful penetration test should explain how a system can be attacked, which security boundary fails and what an attacker could realistically achieve.

ShabuShabu Security combines structured reconnaissance, manual penetration testing and controlled exploit validation to identify weaknesses that matter in the context of the actual product.

01

Understand the system

We map roles, interfaces, trust relationships and security-sensitive workflows before attempting exploitation.

02

Test like an attacker

We examine how legitimate product behavior can be combined with technical weaknesses to create an attack path.

03

Report for engineers

Findings include technical context, impact, reproduction information and practical remediation priorities.

What we test

One product can contain many security boundaries.

The assessment is shaped around the architecture and behavior of the product rather than a generic vulnerability checklist.

01

Authentication

Login flows, password reset, MFA, session handling and account recovery.

02

Authorization

User roles, privilege boundaries, cross-account access and administrative controls.

03

Input & Data Handling

User-controlled input, file handling, data processing and potentially dangerous interpretation.

04

API Access

Endpoint authorization, object access, request manipulation and sensitive response data.

05

Business Logic

Workflow assumptions, limits, sequence abuse and unintended combinations of legitimate actions.

06

AI Workflows

Prompt handling, model-connected tools, data access and agent permission boundaries.

07

Integrations

External services, webhooks, application connections and trust between connected systems.

08

Sensitive Functions

Account administration, payments, user data, exports and other high-impact product actions.

Testing scenarios

Examples of security questions we investigate.

The exact tests depend on the architecture and authorized scope, but these examples illustrate the type of attack reasoning used during an assessment.

Application & Access Security

Can one user access another user’s resources?
Can standard users reach administrative functions?
Can authentication or account recovery controls be bypassed?
Can a legitimate workflow be manipulated to perform an unintended action?
Can several low-severity weaknesses be chained into greater impact?

API & Modern Product Security

Can API object identifiers expose another user’s data?
Can requests be modified to bypass intended product restrictions?
Can an AI workflow access tools or data outside its intended role?
Can integrations become a path into sensitive product functionality?
Can sensitive information be exposed through unexpected application behavior?
Our approach

Automation supports the test. Human reasoning drives it.

Automated tooling can identify known signatures, configuration issues and useful reconnaissance data. It cannot fully understand what a product is supposed to do or how legitimate functionality can be abused.

That is why manual analysis remains central to ShabuShabu security testing, especially for authorization, business logic, attack chains and AI-connected workflows.

Assessment workflow How a security test develops
01
Scope Define authorized systems and testing boundaries.
02
Map Understand attack surface and trust relationships.
03
Test Explore technical and application-specific weaknesses.
04
Validate Confirm realistic attack impact where safe.
05
Report Document evidence, severity and remediation.
06
Retest Verify security fixes after remediation.
What you receive

A security assessment should create a clear path to remediation.

Findings are structured so that engineering and security teams can understand the issue, reproduce it and decide what to address first.

01

Executive Summary

A high-level overview of the assessment, main security risks and the most important remediation priorities.

02

Technical Findings

Detailed descriptions of identified vulnerabilities, affected functionality and technical context.

03

Impact Analysis

An explanation of what an attacker could realistically achieve if the vulnerability were exploited.

04

Evidence

Relevant proof, request examples and reproduction information needed to understand important findings.

05

Remediation Guidance

Practical recommendations for reducing or removing the underlying security weakness.

06

Retest

Optional verification after fixes are applied to confirm that identified attack paths are no longer reproducible.

When to test

Security testing is most valuable before risk becomes expensive.

LAUNCH

Before product launch

Review exposed functionality and critical security boundaries before users and attackers reach the product.

RELEASE

Before a major release

Test new workflows, permissions and integrations that materially change the attack surface.

CHANGE

After architecture changes

Reassess security after authentication, API, infrastructure or application architecture changes.

REVIEW

Periodic security review

Revisit mature products as features, integrations and user behavior expand over time.

Authorized testing

Offensive security with clear technical boundaries.

Penetration testing is performed only against systems included in the approved engagement scope. Testing methods, production restrictions and sensitive actions are defined before work begins.

Engagement rules Controlled offensive security
Authorized domains, applications and APIs are documented.
Permitted testing methods are defined before the engagement.
Production-impacting techniques may be restricted or excluded.
Third-party systems outside the approved scope are not tested.
Sensitive findings are communicated through controlled channels.
Start a security assessment

Find the attack paths before they reach production.

Tell us what you need tested, which systems are in scope and whether you are preparing a launch, release or broader security review. We will structure the assessment around your actual product attack surface.